Overqualified Medical Malpractice Expert Witnesses |
|
|
|
Tuesday, 02 December 2008 23:47 |
|
It is common knowledge that hiring an underqualified medical malpractice expert witness is detrimental to a case. It might come as a surprise that hiring an overqualified expert could be just as harmful. I once heard a trial lawyer say, "why would anyone want to crack a walnut with a sledgehammer?" This often applies to medical negligence cases. Attorneys sometime assume that the better qualified and more famous an expert is, the better it will be for their case. A few years ago I was a designated Emergency Medicine expert on a case in rural Texas. The defendants were an Emergency Physician and a General Practitioner. The case had to do with a missed ectopic pregnancy, its rupture, and the unfortunate death of a young woman.
|
|
Read more... [Overqualified Medical Malpractice Expert Witnesses]
|
Ethics Violations and Medical Malpractice |
|
|
|
Tuesday, 25 November 2008 16:26 |
|
Can physicians be sued for ethics violations? You bet they can! This blog entry will discuss some of the issues around medical ethics.
Health care practitioners have a code of ethics to which they must adhere. Because of the Hippocratic Oath, and the underlying power of their state and national licenses, they are held to a high ethical standard in their medical practice. Patients place their trust in physicians, and thus physicians are bound by this trust. Doctor-patient relationships by nature have open confidential communication as its foundation. In this context ethical principles must be strictly adhered to.
|
|
Read more... [Ethics Violations and Medical Malpractice]
|
More On Same Specialty Testifying Medical Experts... |
|
|
|
Wednesday, 12 November 2008 09:45 |
|
It is prudent strategy to have a testifying medical expert who is board-certified in the same medical specialty as the defendant physician. This ensures that the expert has the proper training to testify regarding the standards of care of the defendant practitioner with similar medical training. In this way, the expert cannot be impugned for being underqualified.
There are exceptions, however. If the expert has a lower level of training than that held by the defendant physician, he/she may still be able to opine provided that 1) he/she completed the same lower level of specialty training and 2) the standard of care in question is ordinarily associated with that lower level of training.
|
|
Read more... [More On Same Specialty Testifying Medical Experts...]
|
Using the Right Medical Experts for Case Evaluation, Medical Record Review, and Expert Witness Testimony |
|
|
|
Friday, 07 November 2008 10:10 |
|
Finding the right medical experts for case evaluation, medical record review, and Expert Witness Testimony is a challenge for even the most seasoned trial attorney. Just as it is harmful to your medical malpractice case to litigate without a medical expert, it is also damaging to litigate with the wrong medical expert, that is, using medical specialists from the wrong medical specialties. As a general rule, the medical expert should have the same professional qualifications as the defendant physician.
In Short v. Atlantic Care Regional Medical Center, the medical malpractice action was dismissed, the dismissal being upheld on appeal, for failure to provide an affidavit of merit from a medical expert qualified to comment on the relevant standards of care. The plaintiff filed an affidavit of merit from a general practitioner who was determined to be NOT statutorily competent to provide an opinion as to whether the defendant Board-certified Orthopedic Surgeon had deviated from accepted standards of practice under the Affidavit of Merit statute in that State.
|
|
Read more... [Using the Right Medical Experts for Case Evaluation, Medical Record Review, and Expert Witness Testimony]
|
Should you litigate without a medical expert? |
|
|
|
Friday, 24 October 2008 10:18 |
|
It would not be wise. Attorneys and pro se plaintiffs sometimes think that their case is such a "slam dunk" that they don't need a medical expert. Don't make this mistake! Attorneys expose themselves to legal malpractice if they choose not to produce an expert and they lose. In Cole v. Atlantic Health Systems, Inc., Appellate Division, A-6320-03T2, June 20, 2005, the plaintiff's complaint was dismissed for failure to provide an expert report. Although a medical expert had been engaged to provide an opinion, he was forced to withdraw for health reasons, and plaintiff, counting on what she felt was a clear cut case of negligence, failed to engage a substitute medical expert in time.
|
|
Read more... [Should you litigate without a medical expert?]
|
The Controversial Case of Levine v Wyeth |
|
|
|
Wednesday, 29 October 2008 23:41 |
|
By now most trial attorneys have heard about the case Levine v. Wyeth which will be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on November 3, 2008. Ms. Levine is a 60'ish year old Vermont women who inadvertently had the drug Phenergan injected by "IV Push" into a hand artery by a physician's assistant. This led to gangrene and amputation of her hand and then later her arm up to her elbow. The medical negligence case was settled last year for $700,000.00. Levine has now sued Wyeth in a product liability action alleging that the product labeling is inadequate. She contends that the Phenegan label should state that it should never be given by direct "IV push".
|
|
Read more... [The Controversial Case of Levine v Wyeth]
|
Post-Surgical Dyspnea in a 52 year old man |
|
|
|
Wednesday, 11 May 2011 21:38 |
|
A 52-year-old man with a history of hypertension presents for an elective subtotal colectomy for colon cancer. A recent workup identified a partially obstructing mass at the patient's splenic flexure. As an outpatient, he underwent a colonoscopy with a biopsy of the mass which revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. At the time of admission, he denied any symptoms of constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss, or hematochezia. He has no history of heavy alcohol intake, tobacco use, or illicit drug use. He does not have a family history of malignancy. He undergoes a successful subtotal colectomy and ileocolic anastomosis, without any signs of complication. His immediate postoperative state is stable, but on postoperative day 5 he develops sudden-onset shortness of breath. He denies having any chest pain, palpitations, nausea, or diaphoresis.
On physical examination, his blood pressure is 132/74 mm Hg; his pulse is regular, with a rate of 105beats/min, and his respiratory rate is 30 breaths/min. His temperature is 98.7°F and his oxygen saturation is 90% on room air, which improves to 96% on 3 L of oxygen via nasal cannula. He is in mild respiratory distress but is able to speak in full sentences. He is not using the accessory muscles of respiration. The examination of his head and neck is normal. He has mildly decreased breath sounds at his right lung base. His heart examination demonstrates a normal S1 and S2 without murmurs or gallops. His abdomen is soft, nontender, and mildly distended with good bowel sounds; a midline incision scar is clean and nontender. He has palpable peripheral arterial pulses in his upper and lower extremities. The patient did not have edema or tenderness in the lower extremities.
The laboratory analyses, including a complete blood cell count and basic metabolic panel, are normal. An arterial blood gas on room air demonstrates a pH of 7.45, a pCO2 of 32 mm Hg, and a pO2 of 62 mm Hg, with an oxygen saturation of 93%. A chest x-ray reveals bibasilar subsegmental atelectasis. He is encouraged to perform incentive spirometry; however, his oxygen saturation deteriorates progressively and rapidly. On postoperative day 6 his hypoxemia is refractory to oxygen via a non-rebreather mask and he is intubated for hypoxemic respiratory distress and impending respiratory arrest. He is transferred to the ICU. His ECG shows an S1Q3T3 pattern and sinus tachycardia.
|
|
Read more... [Post-Surgical Dyspnea in a 52 year old man]
|
|